Phuket Seaview Real Estate Thailand

home
| property for sale
| property rental
| commercial
| about us
| contact us
| Email alert
| useful info
Phuket Realestate
English Language German Language Italian Language Russian Language French Language

October 31, 2010

Phuket’s Fake Hotels Face Shock Checks

PHUKET’S ”fake” hotels have real guests, which is one of the reasons why Phuket’s economy is a basket case. Efforts to tame outlaw operators are now intensifying, with the Thai Hotels Association gearing for a crackdown.

Do villas qualify as ”outlaw” hotels? That’s one of the questions many may well be asking, with ramifications for the property and real estate business, as well as tourism.

Tourists who once went to hotels now no longer check in at official resorts because they have new places to go on Phuket, places that aren’t officially recorded.

The basket case economy is highlighted by THA figures that show international visitor numbers reaching forecasts over the past three years . . . as the occupancy rate of hotels slid by 20 percent a year.

The reason? As fast as the Tourism Authtority of Thailand campaigns attract travellers onto planes bound for Phuket and Thailand, developers keep building new accommodation. Some of it is fully approved, but much of it flits below the radar.

Like a gold rush, Phuket’s steady tourist boom through crisis after crisis attracts plenty of players who want to get rich, if not today then tomorrow.

Methee Tanmanatragul, immediate past president of the Southern Chapter of the THA, told Phuketwan: ”There are so many places now on Phuket, 700 of them. And 61 percent do not have licences. A lot of them are operating as serviced apartments.”

Khun Methee says that calls for standard rates for resorts, hotels and guesthouses to prevent discounting are doomed to fail.

”Every time there is a crisis, there i a call for everyone to work together with set pricing,” he said. ”But the minute people turn their backs, the discounting begins.”

That’s the competitive nature of the tourism business. THA figures show that even average five-star occupancy rates in Thailand have slumped from 62 percent three years ago to 46 percent in the first seven months of this year.

The effect on Phuket is mirrored in Bangkok, where 299 hotels are officially registered, with a total of 58,820 rooms, while there are also 169 indirect operators with more than 48,000 rooms.

What it means is a constant state of catch-up – and a lessening of standards. This inevitably combines with other negatives, including the rising baht and the tuk-tuk rip-offs, to discourage tourists from coming back on a regular basis.

”Twenty years ago, Phuket had a seven-month high season,” Khun Methee said. ”Today there’s a three-month high season, with shoulders on either side. That’s all because of the oversupply of accommodation.

”If you look at Singapore and Hong Kong, the occupancy rates there are 85 percent. That’s because expansion is sensibly controlled.”

When Phuketwan suggested that Phuket needed a person like Singapore founder Lee Kwan Yew to sort out its lawless aspects in tourism and other areas, Khun Methee responded: ”Phuket needs more than one Lee Kwan Yew. We could use a few.”



Phuket ‘Thai Spectacular’ Theatre to Open

A BIG new entertainment spectacular is coming to Phuket, with construction of a theatre and accommodation for performers now underway on a bypass road site, it was revealed yesterday.

The Siam Niramit Phuket is expected to draw audiences of tourists and residents alike with a show that most may see as serious competition for Phuket FantaSea, the successful award-winning tourist attraction based at Kamala, north of Patong.

”Think Cirque de Soleil plus Italian grand opera and classical Thai dance dressed by Las Vegas costumers and staged by Hollywood,” is how one reviewer described the existing Siam Niramit Bangkok performance.

All that can be seen of the proposed Phuket construction at present is a construction site off the bypass road. But the governor’s special committee on the environment was told the project includes 79 apartments for performers and a theatre across 9000 square metres.

The project got the go-ahead yesterday. A local government administrator said the Phuket theatre could be finished by the middle of next year.

Siam Niramit was reluctant today to reveal too much about future plans. But the Bangkok show is reported to have been developed at a cost of $40 million.

The Bangkok theatre seats 2000 at a cost of 1500 baht a head for the 80-minute performance. Food is also available.

At siamniramit.com the show is described this way: ”Over 150 performers with as many as 500 costumes. On top of this, enhanced special effects with the world’s most advanced technology are used to produce a stimulating, very realistic and inspiring experience. This is a Journey to the Enchanted Kingdom of Thailand that no one can miss.”

A rash of new theatres and shows on Phuket appears to also be yet another sign that investors believe that tourism on Phuket will continue to grow without end.

The Joe Louis troupe of traditional Thai puppeteers has a new home at the Jungceylon shopping mall in Patong and is hoping to stage larger performances at the SF Cinema at Jungceylon from January.

Magician Joe Conrad says he will be staging a regular magic show at his own 700-seat venue in Patong, once again at Jungceylon, from December.

Still drawing crowds each night is Simon Cabaret, the spectacular katoey show based in its own theatre at south Patong.



Five Star 350 Room Resort Underway For South Patong

Phuket’s hotel pipeline continues to surge with the announcement of a new 350 key luxury resort in South Patong.
Developed by a Thai consortium under the Yangrangsi Company Limited plans call for 100 private pool villas and 250 key of a 5 star standard. Work is set to commence within the next month and the hotel will tentatively open in late 2012.
The developer is working with Klaus Rauter’s Mai-BS consulting firm in short listing international hotel chains, with an announcement of an operator and name pending final appointment.
Located on a 100 rai site is located after the Amari Coral Beach resort with views over Patong Bay.
South Patong could potentially see a catchment of new upscale resorts with a number of large sites still in the planning process.
Of these Emerald Bay which was previously associated with the Park Hyatt name has been rumored to play host to a Hong Kong led development, and Gaysorn’s Cape Paradise remains on hold, though potentially this remains a premium site.
Talks in the market continue about Freedom Beach back of a Thai led investor and international management chain and the Vanari luxury estate project which had been suspended during the global financial crises.
Looking at the entertainment district it appears moves on the southern fringes could bring some critical mass of higher end accommodation over the medium term.



September 11, 2010

Phuket Locals HALT Kata Royal Condominium over Island View

By Chutima Sidasathian

Friday, September 10, 2010

A PROPOSED seven-storey condominium project in southern Phuket has been halted after five storeys have been constructed because local residents complain that the building may interfere with the sea view.

The project, Kata Royal Condominium, has all the required permits and has been passed by the Phuket Governor’s special committee on the environment. However, in a meeting at Provincial Hall in Phuket City today, local protesters in the Kata area managed to persuade authorities to halt the building while a review is conducted.
The locals say that they did not have any involvement in the approvals process for the property and that the building now threatens to obscure the view off Kata beach to one of the local seascape icons, Crab Island.

With local protesters at the meeting today in Phuket City were the Permanent Secretary of the Phuket Provincial Office, representatives from the Land Office and the Natural Resources and Environment Department, and the Karon-Kata tessaban council.

It is believed that authorities at Provincial Hall have the right to suspend construction, even if the owners and builders have all the required permits and permissions.



September 1, 2010

50 largest landholders control 14.3% of Phuket

PHUKET: Land ownership in Phuket is highly concentrated in the hands of a relatively small group of wealthy landowners, according to a prominent Thammasat University economics professor.

Prof Duangmani Laowakul, a member of the watch-dog committee Policy Watch, said the top 50 largest landholders in Phuket control 14.3% of the island’s total area.

A report published in Krungthep Turakij, the Nation Group’s Thai-language business newspaper, reveals to some extent the concentration of wealth in Thailand.

It also hints at the failure of meaningful land reform in this nation of farmers – and suggests that the inaction of successive governments in overhauling Thailand’s land tax structure and enforcing tax collection is purely a matter of self-interest on the part of those in power.

According to the report, 90% of individuals own less than one rai of land, while 10% own 100 rai or more.

According to the National Thai Institute of Land, some 70% of private land holdings lie idle, held only for purposes of speculation. This costs the economy 127 billion baht yearly, according to the researchers.

Concentration of land holdings may be even greater than the above-mentioned figures indicate.

According to Dr Duangmani, a Thammasat University economics professor, the top 50 landowners in Bangkok own 10.1% of the land in the capital.

Those figures may not appear large, but they add up to a lot of land, he said.

Loss of economic productivity through concentration of land in the hands of speculators is, moreover, not compensated by taxation on that land.

Taxes and fees collected by the government for Fiscal Year 2009 were estimated at only 31.7 billion baht, the report noted.

However taxes and fees were paid by only 5.6 million individuals, or just 8.4% of the population. The reason for that is that tens of millions of Thais own no land whatsoever.

A 2006 survey by the Thailand Development and Research Institute (TDRI) divided families into five groups: the richest 20% held 69% of the nation’s assets; the poorest 20% held only 1%.

Moreover, the richest 10% have three times the assets of the second 10%.

The way to overcome monopoly control of land is by re-writing the tax code relating to land and structures. A draft law has been presented for consideration to Cabinet by the Finance Ministry.

The old law is marred by the fact that tax is calculated on ‘annual income’ rather than on assessed value. Moreover, assessments can be overturned at the discretion of officials, so money leaks from the system easily and exceptions are handed out. The result is inequities that make tax collection problematic.

The high rate of assessment increase, 12.5% per annum, impels avoidance, while the Improvements Tax decreases with time, meaning that taxes go down as values go up. Finally, valuations are established on a basis calculated 30 years ago and now out of date, the researchers found.

A new law should be enacted that places the burden of taxation on the wealthy rather than the poor, the researchers said. They recommend that property valuations be re-considered every four years, and that the highest assessed rate, that on commercial property, be no greater than 0.5% per annum; that assessment on residential property be no greater than 0.1%; and that on agricultural land be 0.05%.

Tax collection and income to the state will be greatly enhanced if such reforms were enacted, they say.

Past attempts to improve tax collection found the chief impediment to be lawmakers themselves.

According to the National Counter Corruption Commission, filings by politicians in the last four governments, beginning with that of Thaksin Shinawatra, reveal that “ten former officials hold land valued at more than five billion baht… and that doesn’t include holdings they haven’t revealed, which we expect is an amazing amount.”

The report goes on to list some of the wealthiest landowners among present and former governments, starting with the Thaksin administration.

The authors conclude that since enactment of change is opposed to the self-interests of the powerful, “reform will pass only with the greatest difficulty” during the Abhisit administration.


Older Posts »